Hot Hand: Existencia y Modelación Estadística
Keywords:
Basketball, conditional probability, Hot Hand, nonparametric statistics, sports data analyticsAbstract
The Hot Hand (HH) phenomenon in basketball has failed to be definitively characterized as a cognitive bias or a statistical reality. To evaluate the increase in success probability after a series of consecutive shots, this study analyzes 210,072 shot attempts made by a group of 481 professional players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) during the 2016-2017 season. To do so, conditional probabilities were calculated, and nonparametric Wilcoxon tests were applied for the entire sample and for each player position. The overall results show positive and statistically significant differences between the observed and hypothetical conditional probabilities under the assumption of independence, suggesting the existence of a Hot Hand effect. When segmented by position, the evidence was concentrated in centers, point guards, and small forwards. These findings suggest that the manifestation of the phenomenon depends on contextual factors and specific roles within the game. They also emphasize the need to expand studies with longitudinal approaches, incorporating contextual variables and complex models that allow for a robust characterization of HH dynamics in basketball.
Downloads
References
Aharoni, G., & Sarig, O. H. (2011). Hot hands and equilibrium. Applied Economics, 44(18), 2309–2320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.564141
Albright, S. C. (1993). A statistical analysis of hitting streaks in baseball. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1175–1183.
Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1369-1378.
Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S., & Raab, M. (2006). Twenty years of “hot hand” research: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(6), 525-553
Chen, Q., & Qin, F. (2022). Application of game theory in basketball defense and offensive tactical. Operations Research and Fuzziology, 12(3), 685-694
Clark, R. D. (2003). Streakiness among professional golfers: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 34, 63–79.
Clark, R. D. (2005). Examination of hole-to-hole streakiness on the PGA tour. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 806–814.
Deng, B. (2023). Basketball Game Theory Analyzes the Choice. En H. Mallick et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Management, and Computer Science (ICEMCI 2022) (pp. 3–11). Atlantis Press.
Forthofer, R. (1991). Streak shooter—The sequel. Chance, 4, 46–48
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314
Hoffman, B. (2024, August 31). The Hot-Hand Fallacy: What it is and how to overcome it. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brycehoffman/2024/08/31/the-hot-hand-fallacy-what-it-is-and-how-to-overcome-it/
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Koehler, J. J., & Conley, C. A. (2003). The "hot hand" myth in professional basketball. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25(2), 253–259.
Larkey, P. D., Smith, R. A., & Kadane, J. B. (1989). It’s okay to believe in the ‘‘hot
Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación Social, vol. 8, no. 3
hand’’. Chance, 2, 22–30.
Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2018). Surprised by the Hot Hand Fallacy? A Truth in the Law of Small Numbers. Econometrica, 86(6), 2019-2047.
NBA Conference Stat Leaders, 2023-24 regular season - ESPN. (n.d.). ESPN. https://www.espn.com/nba/stats/player/_/season/2024/seasontype/2/table/offensive/sort/threePointFieldGoalPct/dir/desc
Simon, H. A., & March, J. G. (1969). Límites cognitivos sobre racionalidad. En Teoría de la organización (pp. 150-189). Barcelona: Ariel.
Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2012). The “hot hand” revisited: A nonstationarity argument. PsyCh Journal, 1(1), 28–39.
University of Michigan. (2021). Foundations of sports analytics: Data, representation, and models in sports [Curso en línea]. Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/learn/foundations-sports-analytics?utm_medium=sem&utm_source=gg&utm_campaign=b2c_latam_x_multi_ftcof_career-academy_cx_dr_bau_gg_pmax_gc_s1-v2_en_m_hyb_24-04_nonNRL-within-14d&campaignid=21239613742&adgroupid=&device=c&keyword=&matchtype=&network=x&devicemodel=&creativeid=&assetgroupid=6501905150&targetid=&extensionid=&placement=&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21320925518&gbraid=0AAAAADdKX6ZJRdZgFow8vdRJ5zrKDpMiX&gclid=CjwKCAjwq9rFBhAIEiwAGVAZP9LHfzKgwMMebPuAVkv2rMI_EOPL6o0shuL0KVgHFfFytNmpB1yaHhoCki8QAvD_BwE
University of Michigan. (2021). Shotlog [Base de datos]. En Foundations of sports analytics: Data, representation, and models in sports [Curso en línea]. Coursera.
Vergin, R. C. (2000). Winning streaks in sports and the misperception of momentum. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 181–197