Antinomies and contingencies. Critical perspectives on progress

Abstract

This text consists of the development of two critical discourses of the project of progress that, despite having different philosophical bases, are linked by the need to radically question the deployment of capitalist modernity. On the one hand, it is the critique of progress proposed by Theodor W. Adorno, whose main philosophical reference is G. W. F. Hegel’s dialectic; on the other hand, the notion of progress is disarticulated through Manuel de Landa’s conception of history, which is based on the Gilles Deleuze’s ontology and Fernand Braudel’s historical science. This paper also proposes the thesis that both critical discourses of progress converge in a common challenge: the type of relationship that social practices must sustain with nature, if their purpose is to break with the domination and destructiveness that accompany the evolution of capitalist modernity.